Author |
Message |
Battlecruiser23
over 9000!
Team:
Main: Ghost Commander
Level: 1138 Class:
Berserker
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:36 pm
|
Galaxy loadout.
Did a deep w3 arm scan of 13-15 galaxies with an Eniac Omega, came up with this:
Smid of Plat Smid of Ferm 1 plot of Plasma Crystals 2 plots of Alien Bacteria 1 plot of titanium 1 plot of silver Extreme overdose of nukes, sili, and mets average oat count.
This was DF250.
_________________ Axis Industries
|
Mon Jan 24, 2011 6:49 pm |
|
|
yugioh124
Team:
Main: yugioh
Level: 1854 Class:
Fleet Commander
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 8:17 am Location: Classified
|
Re: Galaxy loadout.
What's the problem, exactly?
_________________
Dorin Nube wrote: Nipples aren't the only danger here.
|
Mon Jan 24, 2011 10:59 pm |
|
|
Battlecruiser23
over 9000!
Team:
Main: Ghost Commander
Level: 1138 Class:
Berserker
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:36 pm
|
Re: Galaxy loadout.
Prom has 3 gals. The total resources aside from the sheer Loads of Mets and Sili found up in those gals, easily could out profit the 13-15 I scanned by a long long shot.
From running an eniac over Prom's gals(and looking at his 6 dem/ada kits defending the entrance to the three), I'd say his Rubi/DM/Ada, 15+ cols, tons of T1/T2 commods plus ruins(including some ancient ruins)....well, really.
His three gals pretty much toppled the ~15 I scanned, and probably all of TFC space too(which is another 15 gals).
Is it really supposed to be that w2 extremely beats w3 in larger quantity than the w2?
_________________ Axis Industries
|
Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:52 am |
|
|
Masterful
Team:
Main: -T-
Level: 407 Class:
Speed Demon
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:47 am Location: RESISTANCE IS FUTILE!
|
Re: Galaxy loadout.
Battlecruiser23 wrote: Prom has 3 gals. The total resources aside from the sheer Loads of Mets and Sili found up in those gals, easily could out profit the 13-15 I scanned by a long long shot.
From running an eniac over Prom's gals(and looking at his 6 dem/ada kits defending the entrance to the three), I'd say his Rubi/DM/Ada, 15+ cols, tons of T1/T2 commods plus ruins(including some ancient ruins)....well, really.
His three gals pretty much toppled the ~15 I scanned, and probably all of TFC space too(which is another 15 gals).
Is it really supposed to be that w2 extremely beats w3 in larger quantity than the w2? Yes, it is.
_________________
cej1120con on finding SS wrote: A guy showed me runescape, and I said "RUNESCAPE SUCKS DICK" after like 10 minutes of it.
And I googled "GAMES BETTER THAN RUNESCAPE"
|
Tue Jan 25, 2011 2:16 am |
|
|
Battlecruiser23
over 9000!
Team:
Main: Ghost Commander
Level: 1138 Class:
Berserker
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:36 pm
|
Re: Galaxy loadout.
Then why fight over w3? Why rush out to the arms? I don't care for this universe, but I fear for the next ones.
_________________ Axis Industries
|
Tue Jan 25, 2011 10:23 am |
|
|
yugioh124
Team:
Main: yugioh
Level: 1854 Class:
Fleet Commander
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 8:17 am Location: Classified
|
Re: Galaxy loadout.
Isn't it obvious? Eminence Front has always aimed more towards the middle, but we wanted more stuff. We used our secret admin hax to change the resource distribution.
_________________
Dorin Nube wrote: Nipples aren't the only danger here.
|
Tue Jan 25, 2011 4:08 pm |
|
|
jeff mc beth
Team:
Main: Jeff Bobbo
Level: 2048 Class:
Gunner
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 4:19 pm Location: Not where you are right now
|
Re: Galaxy loadout.
yugioh124 wrote: Isn't it obvious? Eminence Front has always aimed more towards the middle, but we wanted more stuff. We used our secret admin hax to change the resource distribution. Lol
_________________
Javatech wrote: Battlecruiser23 wrote: I am a Troll, ignore everything I say.
JeffL wrote: Are you kidding me? Our C2 music is way better than that boring garbage you linked.
|
Tue Jan 25, 2011 5:32 pm |
|
|
trevor54
Team:
Main: Trevor50
Level: 4503 Class:
Shield Monkey
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 10:01 pm Location: Alabama
|
Re: Galaxy loadout.
If Warp 2 is yielding better results, then something needs to be looked into.
_________________
Ricoh wrote: might sound hard 4 u...but learn reading? Stay strong, live long, and walk humbly.
Strawberry Blueberry Pancakes
|
Tue Jan 25, 2011 6:01 pm |
|
|
newman233
Member
Team:
Main: Kangaroo_blob
Level: 3102 Class:
Berserker
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 9:37 pm Location: Married to: CSE
|
Re: Galaxy loadout.
I think it is.
Kanga
_________________
Illegitimi Non Carborundum
|
Tue Jan 25, 2011 6:26 pm |
|
|
Battlecruiser23
over 9000!
Team:
Main: Ghost Commander
Level: 1138 Class:
Berserker
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:36 pm
|
Re: Galaxy loadout.
trevor54 wrote: If Warp 2 is yielding better results, then something needs to be looked into. Yes. It isn't a coincidence that both Legion AND Red Faction have better resources than pants and DM for the individual galaxies. DM obviously sits in a huge area, but from what Threaten told me, 4-5 Tier 3 commods per galaxy is pretty much impossible for a large swath of their galaxies. Yet, my independent after zephyr drops everything in our space report of a random w2 team...it was rare to NOT have more than 3 of those commods per 2 system(2 stars+planets) galaxy. There weren't even moons or low grav planets either. This was full on 3 and 4 base slot planets. You can't tell me that was intended.
_________________ Axis Industries
|
Tue Jan 25, 2011 7:37 pm |
|
|
Markoz
Team:
Main: Pure Evil
Level: 2837 Class:
Shield Monkey
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2004 7:20 am Location: UK > Wales > Bin+ computer with boardband :p
|
Re: Galaxy loadout.
Battlecruiser23 wrote: trevor54 wrote: If Warp 2 is yielding better results, then something needs to be looked into. Yes. It isn't a coincidence that both Legion AND Red Faction have better resources than pants and DM for the individual galaxies. DM obviously sits in a huge area, but from what Threaten told me, 4-5 Tier 3 commods per galaxy is pretty much impossible for a large swath of their galaxies. Yet, my independent after zephyr drops everything in our space report of a random w2 team...it was rare to NOT have more than 3 of those commods per 2 system(2 stars+planets) galaxy. There weren't even moons or low grav planets either. This was full on 3 and 4 base slot planets. You can't tell me that was intended. Ah a leak.. must fix...
_________________
|
Wed Jan 26, 2011 8:34 am |
|
|
The Lost One
Team:
Main: UrQa Vazuk Qii
Level: 2468 Class:
Berserker
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 7:28 am
|
Re: Galaxy loadout.
Battlecruiser23 wrote: trevor54 wrote: If Warp 2 is yielding better results, then something needs to be looked into. Yes. It isn't a coincidence that both Legion AND Red Faction have better resources than pants and DM for the individual galaxies. DM obviously sits in a huge area, but from what Threaten told me, 4-5 Tier 3 commods per galaxy is pretty much impossible for a large swath of their galaxies. Yet, my independent after zephyr drops everything in our space report of a random w2 team...it was rare to NOT have more than 3 of those commods per 2 system(2 stars+planets) galaxy. There weren't even moons or low grav planets either. This was full on 3 and 4 base slot planets. You can't tell me that was intended. What are you basing this information on? I can speak for Red Faction, we have 50 galaxies, 50% of them are totally empty, and there is only a 5-6 out of those 50 that is actually worth extracting commods from, and those resources are nothing special at all, they are actually only on small planets and normally only Tier 2 commods like Quantumum and Alien Bacteria. And from what I know, I have yet to find a source that is classified as "Loads" in W2 this universe. If I ever hear you make up stories like that again about my team resources Churchill, then please make sure to speak to me first, as this is lies and nonsense.
_________________
|
Wed Jan 26, 2011 8:43 am |
|
|
VatFF
Team:
Main: FFs V
Level: 3006 Class:
Shield Monkey
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 4:33 am
|
Re: Galaxy loadout.
Uncle Alex been trollin' this post.
_________________
JeffL wrote: I stopped being able to totally understand that function years ago. Too long since I wrote it, and now it's all confusing. =)
The Voomy One wrote: You gotta be shitting me >_<
|
Wed Jan 26, 2011 8:52 am |
|
|
trevor54
Team:
Main: Trevor50
Level: 4503 Class:
Shield Monkey
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 10:01 pm Location: Alabama
|
Re: Galaxy loadout.
BUMP
_________________
Ricoh wrote: might sound hard 4 u...but learn reading? Stay strong, live long, and walk humbly.
Strawberry Blueberry Pancakes
|
Fri Jan 28, 2011 12:56 am |
|
|
The Lost One
Team:
Main: UrQa Vazuk Qii
Level: 2468 Class:
Berserker
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 7:28 am
|
Re: Galaxy loadout.
While I do agree with DF80-100 having potentials of actually producing better galaxies than DF200-300 every now and then, it should also be mentioned that last uni in DF70 you could find a serious lot of awesome sources of commodities like Jelly Beans, Quantumum (Little doubt on this one tho?), Silver, Gold, Petroleum and such in W1, and those galaxies could also produce awesome colony galaxies.
I think when the Admins have time they should revamp the sorting of commodities in wild space, so that it is actually more profitable to grab higher DF galaxies than grabbing DF80-130 in wild space.
_________________
|
Fri Jan 28, 2011 5:17 am |
|
|
|