Author |
Message |
sinewave124
Team:
Main: genius1
Level: 1955 Class:
Fleet Commander
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 5:12 pm Location: I am EVERYWHERE
|
Re: New PvP Proposals
Mofouler87 wrote: I don't understand why the pvp system needs to be changed. If anything it makes this game more fun and enjoyable. [flame="Mofouler87"]i could not disagree more
i have been podded by people around 2.5 times my lvl in various different places. i dont even bother trying to fight, because there is no point. Being podded over and over again by high levels is anything BUT fun. [/flame]
_________________
ProphetWithoutHonour wrote: Badgerlost wrote: GO fight an FC in a EFDread 1 on 1 as SD and see what happens. Attack with more than one person? You've got a team full of wastes of oxygen like yourself.
|
Tue Jul 13, 2010 10:34 pm |
|
|
Uth Matar
Team:
Main: Uth Matar
Level: 2466 Class:
Engineer
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 7:41 am Location: ExZagreb,Croatia~jetzt Potsdam,Germany
|
Re: New PvP Proposals
majority sucks and veto sucks so it sucks either way , btw admins coudl nto get top10 team players more then once on chat channel let alone for some kind of voting sessions ...
_________________ Curiosity killed the cat . *Est Sularas oth Mithas* Thx k-2 FREDOM FOR WING4+ !!! NOW !!! /viewtopic.php?f=4&t=28872&st=0&sk=t&sd=a The Voomy One :Uth Matar is correct!
|
Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:21 pm |
|
|
panzer!
Team:
Main: panzer1001
Level: 228 Class:
Speed Demon
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 9:54 pm Location: Zanesville, Ohio
|
Re: New PvP Proposals
sinewave124 wrote: Mofouler87 wrote: I don't understand why the pvp system needs to be changed. If anything it makes this game more fun and enjoyable. [flame="Mofouler87"]i could not disagree more
i have been podded by people around 2.5 times my lvl in various different places. i dont even bother trying to fight, because there is no point. Being podded over and over again by high levels is anything BUT fun. [/flame]then dont go by those places lol
|
Wed Jul 14, 2010 8:28 pm |
|
|
Battlecruiser23
over 9000!
Team:
Main: Ghost Commander
Level: 1138 Class:
Berserker
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:36 pm
|
Re: New PvP Proposals
He was a member of LC. LC + DM/TW high levels = dead genius1.
_________________ Axis Industries
|
Wed Jul 14, 2010 8:48 pm |
|
|
sinewave v2
Team:
Main: MathNerd
Level: 1428 Class:
Shield Monkey
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 2:27 pm
|
Re: New PvP Proposals
Battlecruiser23 wrote: He was a member of LC. LC + DM/TW high levels = dead genius1. church you are 0 for 4. this has nothing to do with the TW/DM war the actuall equation is genius1+trying to lvl+unfair pvp ranges+endgame character(iWin)=Dead genius1+ mad genius1 + spam in galaxy chat: i Win i Win i Win i Win
_________________
shawn_mccall wrote: sabre198 wrote: either war the admins or shut up /war Eminence Front
Fallen- wrote: CAN SOME ON WITH A FUCKING BRIAN POST HERE ASIDE FROM MY SELF ?
|
Thu Jul 15, 2010 1:46 pm |
|
|
panzerz
Team:
Main: StarbawIs
Level: 0 Class:
None
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 2:37 pm
|
Re: New PvP Proposals
sinewave v2 wrote: Battlecruiser23 wrote: He was a member of LC. LC + DM/TW high levels = dead genius1. church you are 0 for 4. this has nothing to do with the TW/DM war the actuall equation is genius1+trying to lvl+unfair pvp ranges+endgame character(iWin)=Dead genius1+ mad genius1 + spam in galaxy chat: i Win i Win i Win i Winwho cares? if they kill u just log off, log on later, if ur too addicted to leave SS i advise maybe doing somthing else? and jusy use diff locations, if u die over and over again it is very much your fault
|
Sun Jul 18, 2010 4:57 pm |
|
|
sinewave v2
Team:
Main: MathNerd
Level: 1428 Class:
Shield Monkey
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 2:27 pm
|
Re: New PvP Proposals
panzerz wrote: sinewave v2 wrote: Battlecruiser23 wrote: He was a member of LC. LC + DM/TW high levels = dead genius1. church you are 0 for 4. this has nothing to do with the TW/DM war the actuall equation is genius1+trying to lvl+unfair pvp ranges+endgame character(iWin)=Dead genius1+ mad genius1 + spam in galaxy chat: i Win i Win i Win i Winwho cares? if they kill u just log off, log on later , if ur too addicted to leave SS i advise maybe doing somthing else ? and jusy use diff locations , if u die over and over again it is very much your fault . Uberman i would have to log off if these pvp ranges were at all fair. I did not die in the same place over and over again, i died in multiple DIFFERENT PLACES which i cannot help flying through. So STFU,you're just a derp who spends all his time trolling the SS forums and cant use proper punctuation or SPELL [color=#FF0000]JUST
_________________
shawn_mccall wrote: sabre198 wrote: either war the admins or shut up /war Eminence Front
Fallen- wrote: CAN SOME ON WITH A FUCKING BRIAN POST HERE ASIDE FROM MY SELF ?
|
Mon Jul 19, 2010 4:55 pm |
|
|
thebattler35
Team:
Main: thebattler36
Level: 1791 Class:
Shield Monkey
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 3:24 am Location: Glasgow, Scotland
|
Re: New PvP Proposals
sinewave v2 wrote: panzerz wrote: sinewave v2 wrote: who cares? if they kill u just log off, log on later, if ur too addicted to leave SS i advise maybe doing somthing else? and jusy use diff locations, if u die over and over again it is very much your fault.
Uberman I would have to log off if these pvp ranges were at all fair. I did not die in the same place over and over again, I died in multiple DIFFERENT PLACES which I cannot help flying through. So STFU, you're just a derp who spends all his time trolling the SS forums and can't use proper punctuation or SPELL JUST
_________________
Octo wrote: QFT Octo either owned the fish initially, or scooped it when he podded any/all of the above.
|
Mon Jul 19, 2010 5:43 pm |
|
|
Klestiko
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 12:55 am
|
Re: New PvP Proposals
Quote: Uberman, I would have to log off if these pvp ranges were at all fair. I did not die in the same place over and over again, I died in multiple DIFFERENT PLACES which I cannot help flying through.
So STFU, you're just a derp who spends all his time trolling the SS forums and can't use proper punctuation or spell "just". What?
_________________
Simon, Talking about the Admins and I wrote: Well someone has to play the devil if they are the gods.
|
Mon Jul 19, 2010 11:28 pm |
|
|
Battlecruiser23
over 9000!
Team:
Main: Ghost Commander
Level: 1138 Class:
Berserker
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:36 pm
|
Re: New PvP Proposals
Mutual War opens pvp ranges WAY up. LC warred TW and DM, and those two warred back. A level 2500 could attack a level 800 in w1 with Mutual War up.
_________________ Axis Industries
|
Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:32 am |
|
|
yugioh124
Team:
Main: yugioh
Level: 1854 Class:
Fleet Commander
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 8:17 am Location: Classified
|
Re: New PvP Proposals
What if you make higher team score = higher PvP range? That way 1-man teams won't be able to go around killing all the noobs, nor will teams like iWin, which only has one galaxy and thus cannot reach the numbers needed for a high team score. You could have it cap once team score reaches 600 or so, so that the top 10 teams all have the same PvP range.
_________________
Dorin Nube wrote: Nipples aren't the only danger here.
|
Tue Jul 20, 2010 9:17 am |
|
|
Battlecruiser23
over 9000!
Team:
Main: Ghost Commander
Level: 1138 Class:
Berserker
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:36 pm
|
Re: New PvP Proposals
yugioh124 wrote: What if you make higher team score = higher PvP range? That way 1-man teams won't be able to go around killing all the noobs, nor will teams like iWin, which only has one galaxy and thus cannot reach the numbers needed for a high team score. You could have it cap once team score reaches 600 or so, so that the top 10 teams all have the same PvP range. Please can we have this one?
_________________ Axis Industries
|
Tue Jul 20, 2010 10:22 am |
|
|
thebattler35
Team:
Main: thebattler36
Level: 1791 Class:
Shield Monkey
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 3:24 am Location: Glasgow, Scotland
|
Re: New PvP Proposals
Battlecruiser23 wrote: yugioh124 wrote: What if you make higher team score = higher PvP range? That way 1-man teams won't be able to go around killing all the noobs, nor will teams like iWin, which only has one galaxy and thus cannot reach the numbers needed for a high team score. You could have it cap once team score reaches 600 or so, so that the top 10 teams all have the same PvP range. Please can we have this one? Why? I don't get why everyone seems to hate Solo or small team PvPers. would you prefer EF/TW/DM warred you and killed all your bases WHILE killing you in UZ, W0, W1, W2, W3? Cos i'd rather just have to deal with an occasional group like Iwin... These teams tend to come in spats anyway, they'll cause trouble for a while, the players will get bored and rejoin their previous team or quit. Stop trying to change something that isn't broken.
_________________
Octo wrote: QFT Octo either owned the fish initially, or scooped it when he podded any/all of the above.
|
Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:24 pm |
|
|
Battlecruiser23
over 9000!
Team:
Main: Ghost Commander
Level: 1138 Class:
Berserker
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:36 pm
|
Re: New PvP Proposals
I for one, like larger scale PvP. Actual wars between similar sized teams. No alliance shiz and whatnot.
_________________ Axis Industries
|
Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:29 pm |
|
|
yugioh124
Team:
Main: yugioh
Level: 1854 Class:
Fleet Commander
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 8:17 am Location: Classified
|
Re: New PvP Proposals
thebattler35 wrote: Battlecruiser23 wrote: yugioh124 wrote: What if you make higher team score = higher PvP range? That way 1-man teams won't be able to go around killing all the noobs, nor will teams like iWin, which only has one galaxy and thus cannot reach the numbers needed for a high team score. You could have it cap once team score reaches 600 or so, so that the top 10 teams all have the same PvP range. Please can we have this one? Why? I don't get why everyone seems to hate Solo or small team PvPers. would you prefer EF/TW/DM warred you and killed all your bases WHILE killing you in UZ, W0, W1, W2, W3? Cos i'd rather just have to deal with an occasional group like Iwin... These teams tend to come in spats anyway, they'll cause trouble for a while, the players will get bored and rejoin their previous team or quit. Stop trying to change something that isn't broken. Yes, I would prefer that. Fighting other big teams is fair, because then they actually have something to lose. iWin just built a single gal, and that was just to piss people off. If you kill a normal team's stuff enough times, they'll stop attacking you because it's no fun to lose your stuff constantly. iWin doesn't have anything to lose, and thus cannot be stopped by conventional methods.
_________________
Dorin Nube wrote: Nipples aren't the only danger here.
|
Wed Jul 21, 2010 9:52 am |
|
|
|