Author |
Message |
Battlecruiser23
over 9000!
Team:
Main: Ghost Commander
Level: 1138 Class:
Berserker
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:36 pm
|
Re: Proposal: Changes to the uni size/shape
andezrhode2a wrote: Battlecruiser23 wrote: All had at least one gal at one time this uni. ACHEM Psionic Corps.
_________________ Axis Industries
|
Thu Jul 28, 2011 5:22 pm |
|
|
Bluejayez
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 11:15 am
|
Re: Proposal: Changes to the uni size/shape
Please put this in, and please tell us soon. It would be nice to know before.. The reset and we are suprised by whats up.
|
Thu Jul 28, 2011 7:01 pm |
|
|
red395
Team:
Main: Gold Spacer
Level: 1846 Class:
Engineer
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2009 7:14 pm
|
Re: Proposal: Changes to the uni size/shape
So is it decided to put this in then?
_________________ Goldy http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eanFgyzHlQU&feature=related Courious arent you?
|
Thu Jul 28, 2011 9:02 pm |
|
|
SI
Dev Team
Team:
Main: The SI
Level: 0 Class:
None
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 4:24 pm
|
Re: Proposal: Changes to the uni size/shape
red395 wrote: So is it decided to put this in then? Bluejayez wrote: Please put this in, and please tell us soon. It would be nice to know before.. The reset and we are suprised by whats up. We have decided that we will be using this layout for next universe.
|
Thu Jul 28, 2011 9:51 pm |
|
|
yugioh124
Team:
Main: yugioh
Level: 1854 Class:
Fleet Commander
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 8:17 am Location: Classified
|
Re: Proposal: Changes to the uni size/shape
Wow. I don't remember the last time a fairly major game change got such a positive response, lol.
_________________
Dorin Nube wrote: Nipples aren't the only danger here.
|
Thu Jul 28, 2011 10:38 pm |
|
|
andezrhode2a
Team:
Main: Paximaximus
Level: 2572 Class:
Engineer
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 7:51 pm
|
Re: Proposal: Changes to the uni size/shape
yugioh124 wrote: Wow. I don't remember the last time a fairly major game change got such a positive response, lol. i wonder what that says about the game changes made recently.
|
Thu Jul 28, 2011 10:43 pm |
|
|
Arkainon
Team:
Main: Cpt Lunarion
Level: 1801 Class:
Engineer
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 9:48 pm
|
Re: Proposal: Changes to the uni size/shape
O.o SG was noticed! /warm and fuzzy
Anyway, moving on. I think chaosking had a great idea that might've went unnoticed- draw on X on the current map and remove all connectors along that X so that smaller teams (-points to self-) have a slightly better chance of survival.
Another point: I havent checked myself yet, but if there are no DF400 gals in peri space.. what's the point? O.o And not enough DF300 gals in buildable space.. Probably would cause fights. -is just parroting things-
My own idea was this: One guy said to make a new layer where only teams with less than a score of 200 could build.. That sounds a little restrictive to me, and may encourage weaker teams to stagnate so that they stay safe. How about this instead- Make a new level of buildable space that goes to DF350, and make DF350 gals buildable if your team has a score of over say 300 or 400, and raise the quality of planets only SLIGHTLY. (I'm thinking adding 1 planet to each gal, and increase asteroid rings.) That way, big teams get their fix of feeling all righteous and better-than-thou, and will get their own preferred space area to build in. This would also encourage slightly stagnating teams to push harder to break that cap so that they get a chance to build there, too. Then the smaller teams themselves (-points to self again-) would have less fear of building in lower DF gals because the teams that could crush them probably moved on to bigger and better things. You'd also end up with some ungodly territory wars in that area of preferred space... Would be awesome to watch, imo.
Neglecting that... Lower the DF for wild space so there are more W2 gals, pl0x.
|
Fri Jul 29, 2011 8:20 am |
|
|
taggz1
Team:
Main: badaboom
Level: 1925 Class:
Berserker
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 2:43 am Location: Somewhere in the known..... Tech9's bedroom closet
|
Re: Proposal: Changes to the uni size/shape
Btw you missed Red Dawn, we had 3 gals for the first like week before FD attacked and RF took 2 =P. + Death Eternal had 1 or 2 gals.
_________________
Blue Dwarf wrote: This is what I've taken from this suggestion; Thanks.
This post was edited a total of 1,000,000,000 times.
|
Fri Jul 29, 2011 9:38 am |
|
|
syberian
Member
Team:
Main: Savak
Level: 20 Class:
None
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2010 4:58 am
|
Re: Proposal: Changes to the uni size/shape
Leave EF space as it is, theres no need for it to be bigger if no1 will be able to build there.
_________________ Original Sybir /GodSteel My custom shader
|
Fri Jul 29, 2011 10:44 am |
|
|
Zekk
Member
Team:
Main: Kyp
Level: 2610 Class:
Engineer
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 8:49 pm Location: my desk
|
Re: Proposal: Changes to the uni size/shape
Arkainon wrote: blah blah change stuff so smaller teams have an even easier time blah blah... I don't think you quite grasp how the current changes will give small teams a MUCH better chance over the current system. Since all the big teams have realized this already, I'll go ahead and share this with the little people: the random generation of the wild space sector will create pockets of galaxies that will be easily defensible, because the connections (or lack thereof) reduce the number of entry points to a region down to 2-5, a very simple number to fortify for smaller/newer teams. These bits of the universe would be ideal places for small teams to take refuge, just be careful not to tangle with a big team over them On the current test wildspace map I identified such pockets of up to 25 galaxies isolated by 5 defensible points, and its reasonable to assume that these will appear in the live universe on saturday. One key point to understand here is these arent crappy gals in w1/2... these are df250-300, on the edge, which means they are RICH and smaller teams should try to take advantage of them. tl;dr: blah blah tips for smaller teams blah blah
_________________ Pies are yummy.
|
Fri Jul 29, 2011 10:44 am |
|
|
Zekk
Member
Team:
Main: Kyp
Level: 2610 Class:
Engineer
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 8:49 pm Location: my desk
|
Re: Proposal: Changes to the uni size/shape
syberian wrote: Leave EF space as it is, theres no need for it to be bigger if no1 will be able to build there. the idea behind the bigger EF space is a pvp free PvE zone for those who wish to avoid the pvp, while still including a complete crossection of the AI. I think its a great idea.
_________________ Pies are yummy.
|
Fri Jul 29, 2011 10:45 am |
|
|
Mofouler87
Team:
Main: Mofouler
Level: 901 Class:
Engineer
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 1:29 pm
|
Re: Proposal: Changes to the uni size/shape
I don't think you guys realize how much of a huge gap there is between the top 4 and maybe 5 teams between everyone else. Sure every team has maybe like a few really good alts but these top 4-5 teams dominate everyone else and could easily pvb the rest of SS's smaller/weaker teams. These ungodly territory wars you guys are fascinating over will not happen and most people don't have the time nor feel like spending the money that they easily make back in colonies on bvb so sure the new uni shape is nice and hopefully lead to teams able to gain some ground but its also under the impression they can easily lose it as well.
_________________
s_m_w wrote: Mofouler87 wrote: Why does everyone like to stroke their E-peen on this game? Because e-breasts are very uncommon
|
Fri Jul 29, 2011 10:48 am |
|
|
syberian
Member
Team:
Main: Savak
Level: 20 Class:
None
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2010 4:58 am
|
Re: Proposal: Changes to the uni size/shape
Zekk wrote: syberian wrote: Leave EF space as it is, theres no need for it to be bigger if no1 will be able to build there. the idea behind the bigger EF space is a pvp free PvE zone for those who wish to avoid the pvp, while still including a complete crossection of the AI. I think its a great idea. leveling area? can be
_________________ Original Sybir /GodSteel My custom shader
|
Fri Jul 29, 2011 11:03 am |
|
|
ashta1989
Team:
Main: ashta the 2nd
Level: 2942 Class:
Berserker
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 3:00 pm
|
Re: Proposal: Changes to the uni size/shape
i read nothing but original post and i like itso whatevs, looks good on test too. i love when admins do nice things for us. im seriously considering buying you guys a box of cookies and shipping it to america, GJ.
_________________ Clear all your cd rack wont get none of your cds back! TEEEEMPPPPPZZZ
|
Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:48 pm |
|
|
Bluejayez
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 11:15 am
|
Re: Proposal: Changes to the uni size/shape
Go admins!
|
Fri Jul 29, 2011 3:33 pm |
|
|
|