|
It is currently Sat May 11, 2024 3:57 am
|
Author |
Message |
anilv
Member
Team:
Main: enkelin
Level: 3002 Class:
Speed Demon
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 12:28 pm
|
Re: Jeff - Engine rebalance
JeffL wrote: name / weight / space / turn / thrust / vis Thrust in Shadows / 1m / 91 / 225 / 8335 / 90 (500k more weight, 18% better stats, about the same vis) Bule Blackness / 28k / 63 / 104 / 2607 / 30 (roughly 3x its old stats) Fine Tuned Qua Vazuk / 168k / 25 / 74 / 1857 / 30 (little bit more vis, stats beefed by 9%) Oversized Moral Emphasis / 889k / 185 / 230 / 6331 / 90 (nearly 5x the stats)
Is anyone else wondering why the turning stats are a factor of 10 too low?
_________________ (DefQon1) use a Rhino reconstruotereatarerer - (Pasta) I need to figure out how to get rid of this UrQa Suqqa Ukuk (Bluenoser) Put your finger in your mouth and gag reflex should do the rest
|
Sun Sep 19, 2010 10:18 am |
|
|
JeffL
Site Admin / Dev Team
Team:
Main: Jeff_L
Level: 1028 Class:
Sniper
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 2:21 am Location: Santa Clara, CA
|
Re: Jeff - Engine rebalance
Sorry, I had forgotten that the client multiplies all the turning numbers by 10 to make them look prettier.
_________________ For support, please create a support ticket here and I will get back to you as soon as possible.
|
Sun Sep 19, 2010 11:33 am |
|
|
Asmodeaan
Member
Team:
Main: Asmodeaan
Level: 282 Class:
Berserker
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 11:57 pm Location: Edmonton alberta Canuck country
|
Re: Jeff - Engine rebalance
anilv wrote: JeffL wrote: name / weight / space / turn / thrust / vis Thrust in Shadows / 1m / 91 / 2250 / 8335 / 90 (500k more weight, 18% better stats, about the same vis) Bule Blackness / 28k / 63 / 1040 / 2607 / 30 (roughly 3x its old stats) Fine Tuned Qua Vazuk / 168k / 250 / 74 / 1857 / 30 (little bit more vis, stats beefed by 9%) Oversized Moral Emphasis / 889k / 185 / 2300 / 6331 / 90 (nearly 5x the stats)
Is anyone else wondering why the turning stats are a factor of 10 too low? even having the turning multiplied by ten man those are weak. Particle Churn / 89k / 35 / 1801 / 5700 / 90 / Tech 7 and 1m cost. Cloud Flow / 453k / 77 / 2983 / 12700 / 90 / Tech 10 and 6.7m cost. Giga Cloud Flow / 612k / 276 / 4027 / 17200 / 90 / Gargan missions. Cute Drive / 96k / 13 / 2271 / 6100 / 90 / T10 obtained by capping. Bule Real Keeper / 175k / 38 / 2393 / 9400 / 90 / T9 common bule ruin. Qua Vazuk / 167k / 37 / 2008 / 8000 / 29 / T20 Bana drop. Bule Abadi Darkness / 315k / 65 / 1572 / 5600 / 10 / T19 Rare Bule Ruin. -15% vis. Moral Emphasis / 269k / 86 / 2500 / 9500 / 29 / DG drop. These are current stats on Test. Consider these stats in comparison to your stats Jeff Even the standard Moral Emphasis is better than your "updated" Oversized one.
_________________
|
Sun Sep 19, 2010 11:52 am |
|
|
Demiser of D
Team:
Main: Demiser of D
Level: 20 Class:
None
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 6:46 pm Location: Listening to Fire On High, best song ever.
|
Re: Jeff - Engine rebalance
Tonight, talking in team chat, we came to the decision that it would be ideal if you just left UZ engines exactly the way they are at the moment, and then beefed everything else up to be comparitive.
The way things are atm on test is just ridiculous. The amount of work you're setting yourself up for is insane. Have you even thought about the time wasted in rebalancing tractors, knockback weapons, the weight of every item in the game, and the stats of every AI in the game, just to make sure nothing really stupid happens? Its going to be MASSIVE.
Plus, you're pissing a lot of people off with the visibility changes!
I, for one, just want things to go back to where they were! Things are just fine at the moment, why fix something that aint borked to begin with?
_________________
JeffL wrote: That's it. I quit!
Battlecruiser23 wrote: Fuck you, Cygnus.
|
Sun Sep 19, 2010 6:52 pm |
|
|
andezrhode2a
Team:
Main: Paximaximus
Level: 2572 Class:
Engineer
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 7:51 pm
|
Re: Jeff - Engine rebalance
I figure still do the Emp Prop update. Bork Stealth SDs, and beef a3's mining FWing!
|
Sun Sep 19, 2010 7:00 pm |
|
|
JeffL
Site Admin / Dev Team
Team:
Main: Jeff_L
Level: 1028 Class:
Sniper
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 2:21 am Location: Santa Clara, CA
|
Re: Jeff - Engine rebalance
Well, the problem is that we have 18 new tech 21 engines being added to the game, and without any sort of balancing formulas, the stats we come up with will be more or less random, like the UZ engines stats which in my opinion are just awful for the good of the game.
I think the new formulas I've come up with are pretty good so far, and I thank everyone for the input. I think the current main disconnect with what will work for everyone and what I have is that people are using engines that I was considering to be not at all suitable for stealth as stealth engines, like the Lion Thruster. Old engine visibility values were just random numbers picked out of the air. I currently have the visibility values as fixed constants for engines considered to be "a little stealthy", "stealthy", and "very stealthy", and a multiple of the thrust power for all the rest.
I think what I'm going to do for engines like the Lion Thruster is to make the visibility proportional to the sqrt of the thrust rather than just the thrust and have it land back around at what it was before. I might also modify the engines visibility by the inverse of the turn/thrust ratio.
_________________ For support, please create a support ticket here and I will get back to you as soon as possible.
|
Sun Sep 19, 2010 8:06 pm |
|
|
Asmodeaan
Member
Team:
Main: Asmodeaan
Level: 282 Class:
Berserker
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 11:57 pm Location: Edmonton alberta Canuck country
|
Re: Jeff - Engine rebalance
I'm all for this rebalance provided you don't flog the dead horse that Sniper has become. We're a combat class dammit >.<
_________________
|
Sun Sep 19, 2010 8:38 pm |
|
|
Neolation
Team:
Main: =Neo=
Level: 2230 Class:
Fleet Commander
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 4:23 pm Location: Near your cookies
|
Re: Jeff - Engine rebalance
Asmodeaan wrote: I'm all for this rebalance provided you don't flog the dead horse that Sniper has become. We're a COMBAT CLASS dammit >.<
_________________ http://angelicneo.mybrute.com
=Neo=
|
Sun Sep 19, 2010 9:05 pm |
|
|
andezrhode2a
Team:
Main: Paximaximus
Level: 2572 Class:
Engineer
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 7:51 pm
|
Re: Jeff - Engine rebalance
Neolation wrote: Asmodeaan wrote: I'm all for this rebalance provided you don't flog the dead horse that Sniper has become. We're a COMBAT CLASS dammit >.< Always makes me lol.
|
Sun Sep 19, 2010 9:41 pm |
|
|
Demiser of D
Team:
Main: Demiser of D
Level: 20 Class:
None
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 6:46 pm Location: Listening to Fire On High, best song ever.
|
Re: Jeff - Engine rebalance
JeffL wrote: Well, the problem is that we have 18 new tech 21 engines being added to the game, and without any sort of balancing formulas, the stats we come up with will be more or less random, like the UZ engines stats which in my opinion are just awful for the good of the game.
I think the new formulas I've come up with are pretty good so far, and I thank everyone for the input. I think the current main disconnect with what will work for everyone and what I have is that people are using engines that I was considering to be not at all suitable for stealth as stealth engines, like the Lion Thruster. Old engine visibility values were just random numbers picked out of the air. I currently have the visibility values as fixed constants for engines considered to be "a little stealthy", "stealthy", and "very stealthy", and a multiple of the thrust power for all the rest.
I think what I'm going to do for engines like the Lion Thruster is to make the visibility proportional to the sqrt of the thrust rather than just the thrust and have it land back around at what it was before. I might also modify the engines visibility by the inverse of the turn/thrust ratio. Im glad that you're doing that, because as it is, you have one class that sucks, and you're really hurting only that class. I mean, 1600 visibility on a unholy lion thruster? Seriously? Thanks for the beef to the Giga moral emphasis...i guess... The only problem being its still 100% useless. Its visibility is high enough that you have to tap-move, its 49 size bigger than the ULT used to be, it has no +5% speed modifier, and its stats are roughly 33% worse. Let me paraphrase and boldify that for you. Its visibility is too high, its 49 size bigger than the ULT, and its stats are roughly 33% worse.And its the best "Stealth" engine out there.
_________________
JeffL wrote: That's it. I quit!
Battlecruiser23 wrote: Fuck you, Cygnus.
|
Sun Sep 19, 2010 10:24 pm |
|
|
The Voomy One
Darth Administrator
Team:
Main: The Voomy One
Level: 1337 Class:
Sniper
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 12:06 am
|
Re: Jeff - Engine rebalance
I have a feeling that many snipers will be using the new sniper only engine after we patch.
_________________ For support, please create a support ticket here.
|
Mon Sep 20, 2010 12:32 am |
|
|
kilua
Team:
Main: k-2
Level: 2506 Class:
Speed Demon
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 6:48 am
|
Re: Jeff - Engine rebalance
i went on test the other day.. i feel like stealth SDs got a huge kick to the ass by giving emp prop a nice vis increase and i'm happy with that.
by the way, Whats gonna happen to the Annihilator Thruster? i dont have one and i care much about Albatross getting even worse agility than what he has now >.<
_________________
trevor54 wrote: im only a noob Calypso wrote: adum is the best.
Samantha is second.
Calypso is third.
no wai!
|
Mon Sep 20, 2010 1:28 am |
|
|
Battlecruiser23
over 9000!
Team:
Main: Ghost Commander
Level: 1138 Class:
Berserker
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:36 pm
|
Re: Jeff - Engine rebalance
While I love the fact my Bule Magnetoplasmadynamic type Engines are very very powerful, why couldn't they be stealth engines for Snipers?
The Bule are makers of very advanced Engines, but could not figure out how to make stealth engines for half their Race.
Sounds pretty stupid.
_________________ Axis Industries
|
Mon Sep 20, 2010 1:50 am |
|
|
andezrhode2a
Team:
Main: Paximaximus
Level: 2572 Class:
Engineer
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 7:51 pm
|
Re: Jeff - Engine rebalance
ULT is a bloody rare item and shouldnt be worse then LT or get a 33% nerf, Zerks use em too, not just damn snipers.
|
Mon Sep 20, 2010 7:59 am |
|
|
Demiser of D
Team:
Main: Demiser of D
Level: 20 Class:
None
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 6:46 pm Location: Listening to Fire On High, best song ever.
|
Re: Jeff - Engine rebalance
Snipers shouldn't get nerfed from using it, either! its a damn rare and nice item!
_________________
JeffL wrote: That's it. I quit!
Battlecruiser23 wrote: Fuck you, Cygnus.
|
Mon Sep 20, 2010 10:13 am |
|
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|