All right were to start...Hmm ill start with my last post stating how easy it is to make an unkillable gal. 25 bases is all a gal can have, you might just have to take a few less gals so that you can make this happen.

You don't have resources because you joined the USA alliance and it failed. You were in a secure alliance (EF+SP+all those other teams) but you and your team decided to go join the USA, which ended in a disaster. Now you are receiving the consequences of your decisions. Less team mates less gals less resources. There is a consequence, positive or negative, for every decision a person makes in real life, that holds true in this game aswell.

Fixed

You fixed nothing, my post still stands.

Leave PvP alone I say... Im not any good at it... and Iwin have pwned me a few times....

I think the big complaint is that Iwin have set up there gal in the right spot..they have access to W0 and basically can't be locked in.
Well done I say

I do however, have one suggestion which in my opinion would make the game scenario more realistic....

Have a council that controls earthforce and earthforce space.

This council could be made up of the directors of the top 10-15 teams.
After a common vote, this council can adopt/change some basic directives for the earthforce fleet and bases.
One of these directives can be to deem a team as "pirates" and as such, all earthforce patrols and bases etc will combat the said "pirate team".

This in my opinion would actually force teams like Iwin to build in Wild space where the "earthforce battle fleets" dont dare to venture.

Subsequently, blocking of earthforce AP routes would be minimal and it may encourage more tactical relations with different teams.
it would also make lyceum safer from "pirates".

The above is the basis for the idea... obviously, earthforce fleets would need to be fairly uber and travel in numbers and the rules and parameters for the council need to be set.

I can see several arguments against this idea.... but with debate, this may solve some of the issue's.... and it wont interfere with current PvP.

Cheers....

i don't pvp but iWin attacks me sometimes and either you win or you don't tbh i think that pvp shouldn't be based on glory.Just shorten pvp ranges in peril and such.

BEST IDEA EVER

/signed

Cant they just change teams then?

The agro could be player based, but team wide. So all players on the team that has done that get the hate, no matter what team they build in.

Sounds interesting

I would suggest though that it be limited to the top 10 teams and that any vote to declare a team "pirates" would have to be unamimous otherwise it could be used as a tool in wars.

Like the UN Security Council? Everyone has a veto right, lol. That would make it just as useless as the UNSC. You don't think iwin has at least one friend among the top teams who would not vote to declare them outlaws?

Should be majority vote imo.

I don't understand why the pvp system needs to be changed. Its not like droves of players are leaving because people are killing them. If anything it makes this game more fun and enjoyable. Why can't we go back to the old days of the pvp system.