It is currently Thu Nov 14, 2024 5:52 pm



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
Site Admin / Dev Team
User avatar
 

Team: Admins
Main: Jeff_L
Level: 1028
Class: Sniper

Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 2:21 am
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Post New base placement limitation proposal
In an effort to codify and eliminate a manually enforced rule, we are proposing to add a new restriction on deploying bases where a new unattached base must be within 15k distance of either a planet, moon, sun, or wormhole. This is to prevent people from laying bases way, way out and being annoying.

Opinions?

_________________
For support, please create a support ticket here and I will get back to you as soon as possible.


Fri Nov 19, 2010 5:51 am
Profile WWW
User avatar
 

Team: Eminence Front
Main: yugioh
Level: 1854
Class: Fleet Commander

Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 8:17 am
Location: Classified
Post Re: New base placement limitation proposal
There will need to be an exception for those empty galaxies, so people can connect all of their territory.

Or you could, you know, put stuff in them so they aren't a waste of a galaxy. :P

_________________
Dorin Nube wrote:
Nipples aren't the only danger here.


Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:16 am
Profile
Darth Administrator
User avatar
 

Team: Admins
Main: The Voomy One
Level: 1337
Class: Sniper

Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 12:06 am
Post Re: New base placement limitation proposal
yugioh124 wrote:
There will need to be an exception for those empty galaxies, so people can connect all of their territory.

Or you could, you know, put stuff in them so they aren't a waste of a galaxy. :P


All galaxies have atleast one wormhole so no exception needed.

_________________
For support, please create a support ticket here.


Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:23 am
Profile
User avatar
 

Team: None
Main: Jagur4
Level: 1459
Class: Speed Demon

Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 6:37 am
Post Re: New base placement limitation proposal
Sounds good to me. Things are generally better coded than manually enforced (or not, as the case may sometimes be).


Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:25 am
Profile
 

Team: Strawberry Pancakes
Main: UrQa Vazuk Qii
Level: 2468
Class: Berserker

Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 7:28 am
Post Re: New base placement limitation proposal
Sounds good, but what about non stationary items, such as orbiting moons, planets or suns? Will the 15k distance be calculated from the exact point the item is orbiting around?

_________________
Image


Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:26 am
Profile
User avatar
 

Team: Eminence Front
Main: Spatzz
Level: 2402
Class: Engineer

Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 12:40 am
Post Re: New base placement limitation proposal
Seems undeeded. When someone is abusing that rule to exploit it is clearly obvious and should simply be more harshly punished.

_________________
JeffL wrote:
Come have sex with me in space, my lord


Fri Nov 19, 2010 7:51 am
Profile E-mail
 

Team: Strawberry Pancakes
Main: UrQa Vazuk Qii
Level: 2468
Class: Berserker

Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 7:28 am
Post Re: New base placement limitation proposal
Unless there is a code preventing it, people will find ways to just cross that line in such a small manner so it would seem wrong to punish them. Which would lead to discussions.

_________________
Image


Fri Nov 19, 2010 7:58 am
Profile
User avatar
 

Team: Eminence Front
Main: Spatzz
Level: 2402
Class: Engineer

Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 12:40 am
Post Re: New base placement limitation proposal
Then why not simply boost base vis across the board? Is there any reason you can even make a stealthy kit?

_________________
JeffL wrote:
Come have sex with me in space, my lord


Fri Nov 19, 2010 8:00 am
Profile E-mail
 

Team: Strawberry Pancakes
Main: UrQa Vazuk Qii
Level: 2468
Class: Berserker

Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 7:28 am
Post Re: New base placement limitation proposal
You can always cover the kit with Obfuscators and likewise. There will always be ways to exploit it unless there is set a hard code.

_________________
Image


Fri Nov 19, 2010 8:01 am
Profile
User avatar
 

Team: Psionic Corps
Main: The Crazy Game Maste
Level: 1031
Class: Engineer

Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 3:15 am
Location: TARDIS, Time Vortex, Main Universe, Reality, Big Bang 2, Multiverse 1
Post Re: New base placement limitation proposal
Nothing can cloak 900k vis :P

_________________
JeffL wrote:
Not sure if the quality is really up to snuff, tbh.

JeffL wrote:
Maybe you guys are right. We can leave things how they are for now and get more feedback later.


Fri Nov 19, 2010 8:37 am
Profile E-mail
 

Team: Strawberry Pancakes
Main: UrQa Vazuk Qii
Level: 2468
Class: Berserker

Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 7:28 am
Post Re: New base placement limitation proposal
Try spam 50 Mzungu Obfuscators, oh funnnn.

_________________
Image


Fri Nov 19, 2010 9:18 am
Profile
User avatar
 

Team: Psionic Corps
Main: The Crazy Game Maste
Level: 1031
Class: Engineer

Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 3:15 am
Location: TARDIS, Time Vortex, Main Universe, Reality, Big Bang 2, Multiverse 1
Post Re: New base placement limitation proposal
As I said, nothing can cloak 900k vis :P

_________________
JeffL wrote:
Not sure if the quality is really up to snuff, tbh.

JeffL wrote:
Maybe you guys are right. We can leave things how they are for now and get more feedback later.


Fri Nov 19, 2010 10:57 am
Profile E-mail
User avatar
 

Team: None
Main: thebattler36
Level: 1791
Class: Shield Monkey

Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 3:24 am
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Post Re: New base placement limitation proposal
Also Planets move. a base that WAS 15k from a planet at one point in time may not be 15k from that planet at another, just making things extremely annoying.

I'd prefer base kits themselves to just be given an extreme amount of visibility, so much that it would be impossible to conceal them.


@TLO Electron Cloud type items have 30 second cooldown now^

_________________
Octo wrote:
QFT Octo either owned the fish initially, or scooped it when he podded any/all of the above.


Fri Nov 19, 2010 11:09 am
Profile E-mail
Member
User avatar
 

Team: Strawberry Pancakes
Main: Bobby Bobbs
Level: 2142
Class: Engineer

Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 10:44 am
Post Re: New base placement limitation proposal
I like Jeff's proposal. I can't see any need for people to place a base farther out than that except for the reasons that rules were made to prevent. If there is a way to hard code it that still allows for quite a bit of flexibility, go for it.


Fri Nov 19, 2010 11:09 am
Profile
User avatar
 

Team: Eminence Front
Main: Paximaximus
Level: 2572
Class: Engineer

Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 7:51 pm
Post Re: New base placement limitation proposal
thecrazygamemaster wrote:
As I said, nothing can cloak 900k vis :P

You really are a thick cunt aren't you..

Also, /signed on the idea Jeff.


Fri Nov 19, 2010 11:14 am
Profile E-mail
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.