It is currently Fri Jun 28, 2024 10:01 pm



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
User avatar
 

Team: The Unforeseen Colonies
Main: Thermal
Level: 3024
Class: Engineer

Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 2:23 pm
Post Re: 2 weeks till Supreme Court Obamacare Decision
I am so happy that I live in Norway and not in the United States.


Fri Mar 16, 2012 11:32 am
Profile
 

Team: Eminence Front
Main: Myrtok
Level: 1620
Class: Speed Demon

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:43 am
Post Re: 2 weeks till Supreme Court Obamacare Decision
seanla4350 wrote:
I am so happy that I live in Norway and not in the United States.

Me too :)

_________________
pip8786 wrote:
Dorin Nube... you win the best post on the forums ever award. Well done.


HAL wrote:
You are greedy and ignorant, you can't have everything in life for free.


Fri Mar 16, 2012 11:34 am
Profile
Member
User avatar
 

Team: Strawberry Pancakes
Main: Bobby Bobbs
Level: 2142
Class: Engineer

Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 10:44 am
Post Re: 2 weeks till Supreme Court Obamacare Decision
Dorin Nube wrote:
Jesus 2.0 wrote:
"...promote the general welfare..."

I leave you with that thought.

Four words that have caused so much trouble! What did "promote the general welfare" mean in the context of the time it was written and the people who wrote it?

Unless you really are leaving. In that case, no need to answer :)


Interestingly enough, it meant different things to different people even then. It actually meant different things to the people that included it in the Constitution. In the writings of some of the founding fathers, they go so far as to mention this phrase. Some of them felt that it essentially further restricted the specifically listed powers of Congress to ensure that they only did them in ways that promote the general welfare. Others believed that they included it to ensure that Congress could act on things that were not specifically listed among the powers of Congress in order to deal with issues they did not think to include at the time.

TL;DR: People have been arguing this since before it was written into the Constitution.


Fri Mar 16, 2012 12:56 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2010 3:11 pm
Post Re: 2 weeks till Supreme Court Obamacare Decision
Dorin Nube wrote:
Jesus 2.0 wrote:
"...promote the general welfare..."

I leave you with that thought.

Four words that have caused so much trouble! What did "promote the general welfare" mean in the context of the time it was written and the people who wrote it?

Unless you really are leaving. In that case, no need to answer :)


Whats it worth to you?

_________________
Jey123456 wrote:
back burner is overloaded with stuff right now. but yea its somewhere on there.

landswimmer wrote:
you know that even if you're wrong, they're more wrong. which makes you right.


Fri Mar 16, 2012 3:57 pm
Profile E-mail
Member
User avatar
 

Team: None
Main: SerjicalStrike2
Level: 2684
Class: Speed Demon

Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 2:09 pm
Post Re: 2 weeks till Supreme Court Obamacare Decision
sleepysnagrund wrote:
Others believed that they included it to ensure that Congress could act on things that were not specifically listed among the powers of Congress in order to deal with issues they did not think to include at the time.

TL;DR: People have been arguing this since before it was written into the Constitution.


They did ensure that Congress could deal with issues they did not think to include at the time. It is called the amendment process. If government wants to be able to force an individual to purchase a product like healthcare, why can't they just make an amendment, granting them that specific power?

_________________
Image


Fri Mar 16, 2012 4:04 pm
Profile
Member
User avatar
 

Team: Strawberry Pancakes
Main: Bobby Bobbs
Level: 2142
Class: Engineer

Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 10:44 am
Post Re: 2 weeks till Supreme Court Obamacare Decision
SerjicalStrike wrote:
sleepysnagrund wrote:
Others believed that they included it to ensure that Congress could act on things that were not specifically listed among the powers of Congress in order to deal with issues they did not think to include at the time.

TL;DR: People have been arguing this since before it was written into the Constitution.


They did ensure that Congress could deal with issues they did not think to include at the time. It is called the amendment process. If government wants to be able to force an individual to purchase a product like healthcare, why can't they just make an amendment, granting them that specific power?


Why bother with going through a massive process to do a Constitutional amendment if you feel that what you are doing already falls within he acceptable parameters of the Constitution?


Sat Mar 17, 2012 9:28 am
Profile
User avatar
 

Team: Strawberry Pancakes
Main: Trevor50
Level: 4503
Class: Shield Monkey

Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: Alabama
Post Re: 2 weeks till Supreme Court Obamacare Decision
Psshhh who pays for health care anyways? Keep letting the state pay for mine =)

On a serious note, Australia's health care is just as crappy as the next. I have a person on my team who has a daughter who has a rare disease, and the government refuses to pay for hardly any of it. He has to spend countless hours on his hands and knees trying to earn extra money just to pay back the loans they have had to take out to get her the special food and other items she needs.

Do not ever tell me Australia's health care is of any decent quality. If the same thing was to happen to say my daughter here in the US, I would pay almost nothing to get all of the same stuff and she would have had all the surgeries instantly(I just happen to be fortunate that my parents think healthcare is important), versus the countless weeks this man has had to wait for his daughter in Australia.

Get out of here with that crap.

_________________
Ricoh wrote:
might sound hard 4 u...but learn reading?

Stay strong, live long, and walk humbly.

Strawberry Blueberry Pancakes


Sun Mar 18, 2012 12:28 am
Profile E-mail
User avatar
 

Team: Eminence Front
Main: DemonBlood
Level: 1761
Class: Shield Monkey

Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 1:09 am
Post Re: 2 weeks till Supreme Court Obamacare Decision
so one example is all anyone needs to prove something is bad?

_________________
it is the mark of an educated man, to entertain a thought without accepting it. - aristotle


Sun Mar 18, 2012 12:53 am
Profile E-mail
User avatar
 

Team: Eminence Front
Main: Radia
Level: 1101
Class: Speed Demon

Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 6:04 pm
Location: q3dm17
Post Re: 2 weeks till Supreme Court Obamacare Decision
landswimmer wrote:
so one example is all anyone needs to prove something is bad?
It certainly helps form preconceptions... and misconceptions too!


...
No system is perfect. Ever. It isn't possible. The real question is, "Is it Better?"

_________________
Jey123456 wrote:
That will happen in a future closer than most futures.
Image
No Context. Ever.
Idaten.


Sun Mar 18, 2012 12:55 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.