Seer Thesis by Bastamental
*Edit, Thanks to Timmeh, the collision code topic got tweaked a little. Both suggestions will be posted next to each other.*
Announcement: A poll will be added in a few days, after most of the thoughts and ideas are brought together and edited to a reasonable conclusion in the topic below.
Be aware, not all of the statistical information is necessarily correct, as I am not experienced in all classes. Please ignore anything of that nature. I would like to begin by welcoming everyone to this important topic. I’m sure that you will be satisfied with the amount of time and effort invested in this thesis. I would appreciate gratitude to be shown by staying on topic. Today’s area of concern will be discussing seer and its future. As you all know, seer has fallen behind in the balancing books. As classes, ideas, gear and content gets added, it's only logical to assume less effort to be allocated toward producing content for a less “popular” class.
Now, given that the majority is in full agreement that seer does need a beef of some kind, there are some strong propositions to be made. I am here to make a lengthy approach that will require everyone to take the time to think outside of your given class. Because, the main problem is, there is a good bunch of you that will have your classes changed in some small for. Following, being bias is the most immature way of confronting a debate, if you disagree, please give a fully explained reason for the disagreement and we can discuss. To start, we must accept that there must be classes that seers should be able to dominate without too much problems. Its part of the balance of classes. So, I will arrange which class beats which in order to better understand the roots of my logic. Also, keep in mind that there will be errors in some aspects, especially pertaining to class related knowledge that I am not particularly familiar with. Pointing out small errors as such will be considered derailment in my eyes, and I will try get as much moderation in this topic as possible, in order to have a smooth debate. Also keep in mind that I am banned and will most likely will be absent from the conversation unless a severe comment is needed to be said. Then I will ask whoever is posting to kindly answer in my stead.
Snipers - Always on top, generally because they can range just about every class and generally out DPS others. While Engineers being of the few worthy of battle. They easily dominate FCs, Gunners, Speed Demons, Shield Monkeys and Zerkers, but there major weakness is seers. With great power comes a big weakness, seer does just that. The reason seers wins, is because they are combating the very opposite style of damage they deal. Seers being DPH, snipers DPS. Now, DPS setups usually dominate, but without a target to say around, it hurts there class greatly. Making seers the necessary class to dominate snipers at all times. Snipers, being one of the major roles of the topic will be discussed later.
Zerkers - Tanky, solid DPS and hostile. This class is known to be a solid couple when grouped with a shield monkey. Yet, when alone, in that rare occasion can defeat FCs, Gunners and
Shield Monkeys. There weakness is engineers and seers.
Gunners - Well, lets just say they need work. They are weak most classes.
FCs - Again, need work. They are weak to most classes. Yugioh exempt ofc.
Engineers - A powerful class. Lets face it, this class is amazing. They can out DPS, out smart and tank most classes. There is no end to the tactics an Engineer could use. From grem cannons, to armada infernos, to the all seeing BFDs. They have no weaknesses. They especially dominate seers, there is practically no way a seer can win a Engineer, which is great. With a great PvP class comes a severe weakness like engineers. Again, fully comfortable with balance. Engineer is one of the classes to be discussed in the main idea plot preceding.
Shield Monkeys - Need I explain?
Speed Demons - Fast, agile, burst DPS. Lets just say its an amazing class, not many other classes offer your main ship to also be your travel ship. Can combat anything fairly decently, all varies on weapon, augmenters, and most importantly, technique. Weakest to engineers.
Seers - You know that you have a fun class when you need to tell your opponent were your general location is, just to find each other. They exceed in stealth, radar and critical hits. As shown above, can combat any class other than engineers with a positive class advantage. It sees all and hides from all, and when he/she desires to strike, it is with great precision. There mortal weakness is engineers. Seers are so weak to them in fact, that a set of well augmented acme or titan drones can handle most seers.
Now, before I pass on my suggestion, I would like to explain a little bit of the nature of seer a little further. To start, seer is the greatest example of how DPS doesn’t necessarily matter. With a setup of 3 Seer Mast , A+ or similar variants, in a DPS calculator, it only comes up to about 1.4k DPS. That is staggeringly horrible in the eyes of any class, yet it has the potential power to kill many foes. On the other hand, with a more sophisticated, expensive setup such as 2 AoS, CaP, A+, the DPS can range from 15k-17k DPS, yet no means of supporting DPS. Not for electric reasons, but for real life tactical reasons, such as generally lower shield bank. This can be the greatest and sometimes painful beautys of seers. It is the most effected class by real life situations and scenarios. But, with various different problems in the games aspect, a lot of its potential is null. Hence why I am writing this thesis to assess, discuss and hopefully move forward towards balancing seers in accordance with the other classes.
So after all that being said, it is not the stats, augmenters,equipment or debuffs that seer is lacking. What we need to work on, is modifying different classes and coding to work around what is preventing seers from doing such said actions and/or dampen such potential.
One of the greatest examples of seer's true power was from Klestiko. Back in the day, there were certain items, equipment and codes that didn’t exist during the time. This allowed Klestiko to be great, it showed the potential of seers previously written. But what was it? What changed since then?
The answer is 3 major things were added, Spotty beams [Medium], Collision Code [Major], and Engineer’s vision [Minor].
Lets start with the most minor of the suggestions. Engineers radars are in no way a problem, just a strong annoyance. The problem right now is pinging and the handicap of using an engine freely without being spotted. With any BFDs laid, or a sup radar controller equiped, it is impossible to ping without being spotted and shot down. Now, considering that a seer with an Athena+ augmenter can see a pinged panther from about 150distance max would imply that those drones have some incredibly powerful radars to see from distances up to 800+. My suggestion is to have mutual radars stats as the engineer has. Meaning that if an engineer has a ande radar equipped, so does the drone. Of course the drone's vision would be still augmented by the drone controllers and drone operation augmenters on the engineers ship. In the end, a seer can ping and use engine in peace, while still suffering the consequences if he dares to attack the engineer.
Second issue, Sniper's Spotty Beam. This is far more serious than it seems. In a fighting situation, a sniper would only need 1 shot from this spotty beam to make the fight virtually over. Since the range is so far, about 2.5k average. It is impossible to warp away from the effect of the beam. In fact, since the range and angle of fire is much less at a distance of 1k [If warped], it would make the job simpler for a sniper to hit you, given that its tracking isn’t that great. Also adding, that a sniper can easily kill you with just his spotty. The main problem with seer, is that it isn’t made to stick out “like a sore thumb”. In fact 1 shot counters the entire essence of an entire class, which in no means can ever be balanced. An average seer has about 23k shields with nice augmenters, 57k if he uses a basil sheath, that is less than half of an average sniper's shields. Also given that seer is designed to be snipers mortal enemy, it makes it too easy for a sniper to be the winner, therefore defeating to purpose of a “mortal enemy”. Now, it has been discussed many times to reduce its weapons visibility effect or how long the effect lasts. Yet, the idea is void, because the weapons recoil with a decent augmenter setup is less that 1 second recoil. Meaning that no amount of stat nerfing would be sufficient to counter such effects. There was a suggestion of removing the weapon entirety, but what about its usefulness in PvAI were it was intended to be used? There is 1 simple solution to this problem, and that is to make the effect non light fighter sticky. So, no matter how much you shoot a light fighter with it, the effect wont stick. What does this mean? It means seers are safe and PvAI activity is no longer a problem area. Given that every AI boss is either a heavy fighter or freighter. The only 2 light fighter bosses in game are: Dark Curse and Ares, both incredibly high visibility. Not only will this fix the balance problem, but it will remove spotty slaves from the equation, which are immensely broken in sniper vs seer combat. Also adding, snipers still have a chance of winning if a beam or HGG gun was used. There is hope, its just not so simple.
Finally, the most important, crucial topic, collision code.
Bastamental wrote:
Basta's First Suggestion
This code is amazing. It is enjoyed in so many ways. It brings more of a sense of reality into the game, considering the entire nature of the game is fictitious. But, there is a flaw, it allows Bases, Drones, Speed Demons, Zerkers, Snipers, and sometimes gunners to use this code against seers. The code is simple enough, if its in the way, it gets hit. Its very logical and reasonable. The cons to this great code meant all of seers were brought down to a new standard of counter fighting. My suggestion is that the collision code be void if the visibility of the ship is under 1.0 visibility, implying that you have a stealthy setup and use it for hiding. Now, I completely understand that its not physically possible to just have a projectile pass by somebody. But in this case, it is essential to put aside such thoughts of “formality” and continue to read the following explanation to better understand why it is needed for proper class balancing.
Let me explain through a series of scenarios. Again, let me remind you that the very nature of seers power is found in scenarios and real life situations, hence why this is such a big issue.
Zerk Vs Seer with collision code.
Seer always strikes first, zerk most likely chooses RoPs and targets seer, doing a fair bit of damage. Yet, the zerker continues to shoot. Even if he doesn’t see the seer, yet continues to hit the seer with his wide radius wall of beams. Whats happening? Collision code, what meant to be damage dealt from both sides until the seer disappears as designed continues to be a one sided fight. The seer must escape before he is more seriously hurt. But already the damage is done. He got at least 3 seconds more of DPS on a seer that should have been long gone. Again, a seer that has an average of 10k-23k shields. Your probably wondering, why don’t you just run? Well, the amount of damage stated happened while running from the range of the weapon, plus the compensation of about 60-75 speed that the zerker has while chasing you. Making the battle much more challenging and seemingly unfair.
Zerk vs Seer with new code update
Proper damage dealt towards each other during the correct allocated time frame, the rest is technique and a fun battle, more sided for the seer to win.
Speed Demon Vs SD with collision code
Now, this is by far the most used technique for easily killing a seer. Seer shoots, SD targets and does great DPS, but its not over. The SD simply needs to swipe his beam were he/she last saw you disappear and watches when the laser strikes to know your location and continue firing. This can be avoided with a PWI. Bet there is about a solid 2 minutes involved for a seer to wait before he/she recovers from the PWI's electric consumption. Without this code, it would be a fairly even battle, generally more sided to the SD though.
Speed Demon Vs Seer with new code update.
Seer shoots, appropriate damage dealt to each during the original intended time frame. Still with this code in place, the SD will have an advantage over the seer. Which is ok, seer isn’t made for killing everything.
Base vs Seer with collision code.
By far, the most annoying time in a seers life. During a PvB or such, there are bullets flying EVERWERE, I have experienced many PvBs with the same outcome. I always end up getting 1-2hit by a base that never even saw me in the first place. Making it full of unenjoyable and grieving.
Base vs Seer with new code update.
A nice day, usually just there to have a fun time and kill some tractor ships or support kills. No problems, no balance issues.
ORMail wrote:
*Tweaked a little by Basta*
Instead, why not just make all beams pass through any unseen target? It would solve most seer CC related issues for the most part. Also, a skill that would be trained up to 30. That increases the % chance that a pulse/mag projectile would pass over a unseen object. After the end of training, the % of that would be from 50-80%, all depending on what the devs agree is within balance.
In the end, the result would return seers back to the balanced days. Ofc not entirely but its a very firm start.
And of course,
/discuss
========================================================
========================================================
Comment/Answer Post *Edit, adding to the topic, will update frequently*
Index:
Q= Question/Opinion Stated
A= My answer to such said statement.
============================================================================
Q1:
paxiprime wrote:
Imo the only thing that needs to be changed about seer is their ability to go back to low vis faster.
A1:Very Very OP. It couldn't possible be balanced.
============================================================================
Q2:
biggee531 wrote:
Regardless, seers shouldn't be invincible just by being invisible. I think a 50% chance to dodge is a lot more appropriate. Having a near invincible stealth class poses a lot of issues for PvB/BvB balance.
A2:
paxiprime wrote:
Seer shoots a base, base insta owns seer for that split second he was visible.. Lol
============================================================================
Q3:
VatFF wrote:
If the base has any form of bullet weapons its easy to dodge as seer though
the only problem is pure beam bases
A3: With an average speed of 130-165, dodging/reaction time is impossible, even with pulse weapons. Only takes an average of 2-4 shots to kill a seer. 2 shots being an eclipse, 4 being a bsheath. Also might I add that a good % of kits are beam only.
============================================================================
Q4:
Mail wrote:
Drone vision suggestion: Then we'll have engineers bitching their drones won't be able to see anything. There is no flaw. Seers just can't fight/kill engineers/shield monkeys that are awake. Those two should be the classes they have no chance against. The rest should be lessering degrees of difficulty from near-always-win to a medium challenge.
Spotty Beam: No. SS is a 'sandbox' came. While game mechanics nudge at classes using some ship/damage/aug, etc... Types over others doesn't mean that such a MONSTROUS advantage should be given. What of HF, Freighter and Capital ship seers? Sure, they might not be super low vis, but they sure as shit won't be if they're still subject to the same effects.
It should be a PvAi weapon only. That is what is what it was introduced for and therefore what it should be used for.
Collision Code: No class should be immune to such a crucial game mechanic. Changes should not be added to seer class.
-Perhaps a skill similar to Transference Mastery; Dimensional Flux Harnessing? Or something fancy like that ... Maxed at 30, gives 30% Chance of being passed 'through' by a projectile (Excluding physical weapons damage type) when unseen by shooter.
-Ethereal weapons should not hit you if you're not targeted.
-Beams, even if non-ethereal should not hit you if you're unseen (targeted or untargetted) by the shooter.
Timmeh--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A4 Part 1:
Mail wrote:
Drone vision suggestion: Then we'll have engineers bitching their drones won't be able to see anything.
No class should be able to see a class that isn't intending to be visible. [Shooting for example, or tractoring]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A4 Part 2:
Mail wrote:
Seers just can't fight/kill engineers/shield monkeys that are awake. Those two should be the classes they have no chance against.
Your absolutely right. Seers will never beat a prepared an Engineer under any reasonable situation. The suggestion is only intended for the freedom of movement/recon such as pinging or using an engine to the full extent needed. Also, for reasons stated above.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A4 Part 3:
Mail wrote:
Spotty Beam: No. SS is a 'sandbox' came. While game mechanics nudge at classes using some ship/damage/aug, etc... Types over others doesn't mean that such a MONSTEROUS advantage should be given. What of HF, Freighter and Capital ship seers? Sure, they might not be super low vis, but they sure as shit won't be if they're still subject to the same effects.
It sould be a PvAi weapon only. That is what is what it was introduced for and therefore what it should be used for.
As stated in the thesis, the nature of damage from 1 class to another is the complete opposite [In common cases]. DPS and DPH and seer is what comes on top. Furthermore, this weapon prevents that and defeats the purpose of balance. In conclusion, Snipers should always have a disadvantage.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A4 Part 4:
Mail wrote:
Spotty Beam:
It sould be a PvAi weapon only. That is what is what it was introduced for and therefore what it should be used for.
Agreed. But lets face it, it wont happen. But, then again, its all up the admins isn't it? If we have a healthy discussion, whatever they see fit should be in alignment with reason.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A4: Part 5:
Mail wrote:
Collision Code: No class should be immune to such a crucial game mechanic. Changes should not be added to seer class.
-Perhaps a skill similar to Transference Mastery; Dimensional Flux Harnessing? Or something fancy like that ... Maxed at 30, gives 30% Chance of being passed 'through' by a projectile (Excluding physical weapons damage type) when unseen by shooter.
-Ethereal weapons should not hit you if you're not targeted.
-Beams, even if non-ethereal should not hit you if you're unseen (targeted or untargetted) by the shooter.
Timmeh A4: This is by far the best reason I wrote this paper. If any code like this is added, it should be in the 80-90% range. Given that there are countless RoF setups out there. Also, SDs have the tendency to use this cc the most.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A5 Part 6:
Mail wrote:
Collision Code:
-Ethereal weapons should not hit you if you're not targeted.
-Beams, even if non-ethereal should not hit you if you're unseen (targeted or untargetted) by the shooter.
Timmeh
Couldn't agree more. In fact, this is most likely going to be the kicker! Since 90% of any weapon shot at a seer for cc use is a beam! You've done it my good sir! I will work on tweaking the topic.
==================================================
Q6:
Blue Dwarf wrote:
I don't think BFD radars have been changed since Klestiko was around, just people saw their potential since then. Likewise, I have a feeling Collision Code has been in since before he 'left' too.
A6:Drone controllers and Drone ops augs weren't around in Kles's time. Therefore Engineers were much weaker in every aspect.
==================================================
Q7:
seanla4350 wrote:
Also, for those of you who raise a concern with the collision code, remember that Seers also have the advantage from (a bug?) being able to actually hide from a tracking weapon and not get hit at all. I've aimed for plenty of Seers with MagCannons while they are visible from shooting, and when they stealth, my MagCannon will track after them, but never hit. It just drifts over them like they are impossible to hit.
A7:This is a bug that is caused from the + velocity added from sniper class. We should all be dead in theory.