| Author |
Message |
|
Chaosking3
Team: 
Main: Spatzz
Level: 2402
Class:
Engineer
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 12:40 am
|
 Re: Trade Efficiency Redefined If someone has unlimited money what slaves would you use on MfM and non MfM alts?
_________________
JeffL wrote: Come have sex with me in space, my lord
|
| Sun Apr 01, 2012 9:18 pm |
  |
 |
|
a jedi master
Team: 
Main: the speed of dark
Level: 1874
Class:
Engineer
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 12:42 am Location: omg, you stalker!
|
Re: Trade Efficiency Redefined No idea how to make a good battle thatch slave yet, til someone posts a setup. But Levi+ are #3 see the tables
_________________
|
| Mon Apr 02, 2012 12:42 am |
|
|
|
The Salty One
Team:
Main: Eurus
Level: 2330
Class:
Shield Monkey
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 5:27 pm
|
Re: Trade Efficiency Redefined Chaosking3 wrote: If someone has unlimited money what slaves would you use on MfM and non MfM alts? SSS. Pimp that ride.
_________________
Space for rent!
|
| Tue Apr 03, 2012 3:02 am |
|
|
|
newman233
Member
Team: 
Main: Kangaroo_blob
Level: 3102
Class:
Berserker
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 9:37 pm Location: Married to: CSE
|
Re: Trade Efficiency Redefined The Salty One wrote: Chaosking3 wrote: If someone has unlimited money what slaves would you use on MfM and non MfM alts? SSS. Pimp that ride. Yeah, from looking at it SSS are by far the way to go. Kanga
_________________
Illegitimi Non Carborundum
|
| Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:27 pm |
|
|
|
Speedbolt
Team: 
Main: Freddy
Level: 329
Class:
Speed Demon
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 11:34 pm
|
Re: Trade Efficiency Redefined newman233 wrote: The Salty One wrote: Chaosking3 wrote: If someone has unlimited money what slaves would you use on MfM and non MfM alts? SSS. Pimp that ride. Yeah, from looking at it SSS are by far the way to go. Kanga Ya! And they only cost 10x what battle thatches do and are less effecient, atleast in small spaces..
_________________
Mail wrote: adum is just stupid. Timmeh
Camsy wrote: When a topic gets so intense even the tl;dr doesn't make sense.
NewFound wrote: If it true you are an idiot. If it isn't you are an idiot.
Idiot.
|
| Fri Apr 13, 2012 5:50 am |
|
|
|
sabre198
Member
Team: 
Main: topbuzzz
Level: 4129
Class:
Shield Monkey
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 12:31 pm Location: Timmeh!
|
Re: Trade Efficiency Redefined until TS can do multiple commods in a run BT's will be very ineficient where you dont have huge amounts of a single commod to shift. Prolly a waste to use a BT to distribute something that the colony only buys a small amount of
_________________
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
landswimmer wrote: IN C1, TIMEWARP SCREWS YOU!
|
| Fri Apr 13, 2012 7:12 am |
  |
|
|
Rounder
Member
Team: 
Main: Rhys
Level: 2261
Class:
Shield Monkey
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 7:57 pm
|
Re: Trade Efficiency Redefined Haha, Anyways great guide. Woulda saved me a buncha time when deciding what to do a year ago 
_________________
I am so clever that sometimes I don't understand a single word of what I am saying.
- Oscar Wilde
|
| Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:31 pm |
|
|
|
seanla4350
Team: 
Main: Thermal
Level: 3024
Class:
Engineer
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 2:23 pm
|
Re: Trade Efficiency Redefined I still prefer my Leviathan+s, they can haul too much stuff. One slave alone can distribute commodities like Crack Whores to 50 bases for each colony tick.
|
| Wed Apr 18, 2012 2:05 am |
|
|
|
Chaosking3
Team:
Main: Spatzz
Level: 2402
Class:
Engineer
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 12:40 am
|
Re: Trade Efficiency Redefined Isn't the order list capped at 50?
_________________
JeffL wrote: Come have sex with me in space, my lord
|
| Thu Apr 19, 2012 11:43 pm |
|
|
|
a jedi master
Team:
Main: the speed of dark
Level: 1874
Class:
Engineer
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 12:42 am Location: omg, you stalker!
|
Re: Trade Efficiency Redefined Chaosking3 wrote: Isn't the order list capped at 50? No. I have 64
_________________
|
| Fri Apr 20, 2012 12:23 am |
|
|
|
seanla4350
Team:
Main: Thermal
Level: 3024
Class:
Engineer
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 2:23 pm
|
Re: Trade Efficiency Redefined Well I don't have 50 colonies, but it was more an example of how powerful those slaves are. 25 000 hull space and 150 speed means that the slave needs one trip to each colony every two hours, pretty awesome for sure!
|
| Fri Apr 20, 2012 1:25 am |
|
|
|
a jedi master
Team:
Main: the speed of dark
Level: 1874
Class:
Engineer
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 12:42 am Location: omg, you stalker!
|
Re: Trade Efficiency Redefined Bumpdate:
Battle Thatches are quite useless until a good aug setup is found
5 nimbleness?
And take up 8 slave slots but are inefficient and slow. Levi+'s also take 8 slave slots and can move the max good for several colonies easy, and won't ever miss a base. Hopefully.
For the high end slaver, I suggest Levi+ for nukes/silicon/peasants and EFF/Vazaha Prototype for rations/nukes/silicon/prom/pirate crests/dark lead
_________________
|
| Fri May 11, 2012 5:48 am |
|
|
|
anilv
Member
Team:
Main: enkelin
Level: 3002
Class:
Speed Demon
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 12:28 pm
|
Re: Trade Efficiency Redefined Why not Santa's Special Sleigh?
_________________
(DefQon1) use a Rhino reconstruotereatarerer
-
(Pasta) I need to figure out how to get rid of this UrQa Suqqa Ukuk
(Bluenoser) Put your finger in your mouth and gag reflex should do the rest
|
| Fri May 11, 2012 9:32 am |
|
|
|
a jedi master
Team:
Main: the speed of dark
Level: 1874
Class:
Engineer
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 12:42 am Location: omg, you stalker!
|
Re: Trade Efficiency Redefined anilv wrote: Why not Santa's Special Sleigh? 20-50b would only be worth the effort after 3-4 unis of colonzing
_________________
|
| Fri May 11, 2012 9:36 am |
|
|
|
