Kobald is fine; it is possible to keep him from tweaking as much if you do it properly.

No point in disputing it here. I used to think that until I played with him a bit more and figured out what makes him inclined to tweak.

i thought ID was intended for seers and snipers. well, i tried it on my seer, it was laughable, i could barely crit or dps.


mabe raise crit resists and add TONS of crit vurn? that way, seers can do some massive hits and mabe have a chance of 1-3 manning it

Nah, seers are not designed to do any ubers. Or anything else for that matter

It wasnt intended for any specific class.

Nightfury is nothing to do with it. In fact, if Nightfury was in ID, I'd be lolling at whoever put Nightfury in there.

ID isn't intended for any particular class, but a few bosses have things done in a certain way to make one class more 'desirable', or 'usable' than another.

When people say "Intended for a X class", that is what they mean.


If an uber has extremely high regen, but low bank and low resists in where a few seers could volley it out of existence, I'd say the boss was intended for seer, even though a squad with snipers could overpower the regen.

Not the same thing... At all.

Oh, but it is. What people say and what devs mean are two different things. If a dev says it's desirable to have a stealthy dps class on the run, people think of sniper.

And they say it's meant for snipers.

Because sniper is a stealthy dps class.

But if said dev was actually talking about a stealth SD, Gunner, or Seer, people would still say Sniper because to the general public, stealth and dps are most associated with sniper, and then 50/50 on SD/seer, and then gunner(shawn).


How would you feel to be the one who made the zone and seer was the class that was to you "desirable" to take along? And then the playerbase gets a stealthy gunner instead...

Sadly true.