Excellent rant. This is how people should rant, not that shitty stuff from the noobs that i can't even understand.

I honestly don't notice a difference in them, just slaughtered my way through a few DGs of them out of curiousity. Don't know what you're all whining about, they're still perfectly killable, lol.

Used my lower level sniper: 1150, Rizer, PSS, Hell's Gate on a Greener/Qa/Z+ setup and other misc gear.

It's actually a danger for my if I get cocky. Now thats how DF330 is supposed to feel like!

Now make dg's actually rewarding and make them stop dropping shitloads of useless bps >.>

That'd involve nerfing colonies to compensate.

Seems more then logical to me, passive credit earning should be way less rewarding then active credit earning.

Idk about reaver's gear but I cant recall any1 saying that reavers hit harder than mf reavers.

They do, well, did.

That being said, I don't want to be THAT guy but I now find MF Picks, MF Forgies, GB rooms and Watt rooms and even Plattie rooms! to be easier then MF Reavers =/

The issue I am running into is Reavers are now simply to abundent.

Too much beef, perhaps?

They're still easy to me as a sniper but my SD has a harsh time.

I... have nothing to say to this. I usually try to assume that anything that I would normally consider an insult is just a misunderstanding on my part, but that's very hard to do in your case.

You want new content. Sure, I'm actually working on something right now.
You want Reavers to stay cannon fodder with pathetic damage that also happen to drop a lot of pretty good stuff. Sorry, I don't like that. Actually, I have stopped considering this as a "MF Reaver beef" because it actually is a "MF Reaver fix". They lost their overloader by accident, I just readded it. In fact, I added a much WEAKER overloader than they had originally.

And to further strenghen all of my arguments, here's a pony for you:

I think I love you, smw.

i find this "they lost overloader by accident" agrument a bit stupid seriosly, i remeber when they were last time beefed, and they were as broken as they are now, back then (for whatever reason) they got nerfed, and nwo u beefed them back, with all respect but arguing "it should have been like that in first place" is a lame reason to switch very old content that been there for .. i can say years now.
The simple fact is u wanted to beef them cause people lvl on them and u dont like it, and if u really think u can make us think there is another superior "it should have been like that in first place"-balancing reason.. common plz.

they were always used to lvl, not a secret not a surprise, there been lots of lists done by checking the amount of ai kills, and now u suddenly feel the urgent need to "balance" them.. redicilouse