There will need to be an exception for those empty galaxies, so people can connect all of their territory.
Or you could, you know, put stuff in them so they aren't a waste of a galaxy.
| Star Sonata http://www.starsonata.com/forum/ |
|
| New base placement limitation proposal http://www.starsonata.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=41759 |
Page 1 of 4 |
| Author: | JeffL [ Fri Nov 19, 2010 5:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | New base placement limitation proposal |
In an effort to codify and eliminate a manually enforced rule, we are proposing to add a new restriction on deploying bases where a new unattached base must be within 15k distance of either a planet, moon, sun, or wormhole. This is to prevent people from laying bases way, way out and being annoying. Opinions? |
|
| Author: | yugioh124 [ Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:16 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: New base placement limitation proposal |
There will need to be an exception for those empty galaxies, so people can connect all of their territory. Or you could, you know, put stuff in them so they aren't a waste of a galaxy.
|
|
| Author: | The Voomy One [ Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: New base placement limitation proposal |
yugioh124 wrote: There will need to be an exception for those empty galaxies, so people can connect all of their territory. Or you could, you know, put stuff in them so they aren't a waste of a galaxy. All galaxies have atleast one wormhole so no exception needed. |
|
| Author: | Jagur4 [ Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: New base placement limitation proposal |
Sounds good to me. Things are generally better coded than manually enforced (or not, as the case may sometimes be). |
|
| Author: | The Lost One [ Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:26 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: New base placement limitation proposal |
Sounds good, but what about non stationary items, such as orbiting moons, planets or suns? Will the 15k distance be calculated from the exact point the item is orbiting around? |
|
| Author: | Chaosking3 [ Fri Nov 19, 2010 7:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: New base placement limitation proposal |
Seems undeeded. When someone is abusing that rule to exploit it is clearly obvious and should simply be more harshly punished. |
|
| Author: | The Lost One [ Fri Nov 19, 2010 7:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: New base placement limitation proposal |
Unless there is a code preventing it, people will find ways to just cross that line in such a small manner so it would seem wrong to punish them. Which would lead to discussions. |
|
| Author: | Chaosking3 [ Fri Nov 19, 2010 8:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: New base placement limitation proposal |
Then why not simply boost base vis across the board? Is there any reason you can even make a stealthy kit? |
|
| Author: | The Lost One [ Fri Nov 19, 2010 8:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: New base placement limitation proposal |
You can always cover the kit with Obfuscators and likewise. There will always be ways to exploit it unless there is set a hard code. |
|
| Author: | thecrazygamemaster [ Fri Nov 19, 2010 8:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: New base placement limitation proposal |
Nothing can cloak 900k vis
|
|
| Author: | The Lost One [ Fri Nov 19, 2010 9:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: New base placement limitation proposal |
Try spam 50 Mzungu Obfuscators, oh funnnn. |
|
| Author: | thecrazygamemaster [ Fri Nov 19, 2010 10:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: New base placement limitation proposal |
As I said, nothing can cloak 900k vis
|
|
| Author: | thebattler35 [ Fri Nov 19, 2010 11:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: New base placement limitation proposal |
Also Planets move. a base that WAS 15k from a planet at one point in time may not be 15k from that planet at another, just making things extremely annoying. I'd prefer base kits themselves to just be given an extreme amount of visibility, so much that it would be impossible to conceal them. @TLO Electron Cloud type items have 30 second cooldown now^ |
|
| Author: | sleepysnagrund [ Fri Nov 19, 2010 11:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: New base placement limitation proposal |
I like Jeff's proposal. I can't see any need for people to place a base farther out than that except for the reasons that rules were made to prevent. If there is a way to hard code it that still allows for quite a bit of flexibility, go for it. |
|
| Author: | andezrhode2a [ Fri Nov 19, 2010 11:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: New base placement limitation proposal |
thecrazygamemaster wrote: As I said, nothing can cloak 900k vis You really are a thick cunt aren't you.. Also, /signed on the idea Jeff. |
|
| Page 1 of 4 | All times are UTC - 5 hours |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|