Star Sonata http://www.starsonata.com/forum/ |
|
Trade Efficiency Redefined http://www.starsonata.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=50998 |
Page 3 of 3 |
Author: | Chaosking3 [ Sun Apr 01, 2012 9:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Trade Efficiency Redefined |
If someone has unlimited money what slaves would you use on MfM and non MfM alts? |
Author: | a jedi master [ Mon Apr 02, 2012 12:42 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Trade Efficiency Redefined |
No idea how to make a good battle thatch slave yet, til someone posts a setup. But Levi+ are #3 see the tables |
Author: | The Salty One [ Tue Apr 03, 2012 3:02 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Trade Efficiency Redefined |
Chaosking3 wrote: If someone has unlimited money what slaves would you use on MfM and non MfM alts? SSS. Pimp that ride. |
Author: | newman233 [ Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Trade Efficiency Redefined |
The Salty One wrote: Chaosking3 wrote: If someone has unlimited money what slaves would you use on MfM and non MfM alts? SSS. Pimp that ride. Yeah, from looking at it SSS are by far the way to go. Kanga |
Author: | Speedbolt [ Fri Apr 13, 2012 5:50 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Trade Efficiency Redefined |
newman233 wrote: The Salty One wrote: Chaosking3 wrote: If someone has unlimited money what slaves would you use on MfM and non MfM alts? SSS. Pimp that ride. Yeah, from looking at it SSS are by far the way to go. Kanga Ya! And they only cost 10x what battle thatches do and are less effecient, atleast in small spaces.. |
Author: | sabre198 [ Fri Apr 13, 2012 7:12 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Trade Efficiency Redefined |
until TS can do multiple commods in a run BT's will be very ineficient where you dont have huge amounts of a single commod to shift. Prolly a waste to use a BT to distribute something that the colony only buys a small amount of |
Author: | Rounder [ Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Trade Efficiency Redefined |
Haha, Anyways great guide. Woulda saved me a buncha time when deciding what to do a year ago |
Author: | seanla4350 [ Wed Apr 18, 2012 2:05 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Trade Efficiency Redefined |
I still prefer my Leviathan+s, they can haul too much stuff. One slave alone can distribute commodities like Crack Whores to 50 bases for each colony tick. |
Author: | Chaosking3 [ Thu Apr 19, 2012 11:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Trade Efficiency Redefined |
Isn't the order list capped at 50? |
Author: | a jedi master [ Fri Apr 20, 2012 12:23 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Trade Efficiency Redefined |
Chaosking3 wrote: Isn't the order list capped at 50? No. I have 64 |
Author: | seanla4350 [ Fri Apr 20, 2012 1:25 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Trade Efficiency Redefined |
Well I don't have 50 colonies, but it was more an example of how powerful those slaves are. 25 000 hull space and 150 speed means that the slave needs one trip to each colony every two hours, pretty awesome for sure! |
Author: | a jedi master [ Fri May 11, 2012 5:48 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Trade Efficiency Redefined |
Bumpdate: Battle Thatches are quite useless until a good aug setup is found 5 nimbleness? And take up 8 slave slots but are inefficient and slow. Levi+'s also take 8 slave slots and can move the max good for several colonies easy, and won't ever miss a base. Hopefully. For the high end slaver, I suggest Levi+ for nukes/silicon/peasants and EFF/Vazaha Prototype for rations/nukes/silicon/prom/pirate crests/dark lead |
Author: | anilv [ Fri May 11, 2012 9:32 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Trade Efficiency Redefined |
Why not Santa's Special Sleigh? |
Author: | a jedi master [ Fri May 11, 2012 9:36 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Trade Efficiency Redefined |
anilv wrote: Why not Santa's Special Sleigh? 20-50b would only be worth the effort after 3-4 unis of colonzing |
Page 3 of 3 | All times are UTC - 5 hours |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |