Star Sonata
http://www.starsonata.com/forum/

keeping to my word.
http://www.starsonata.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=50246
Page 4 of 6

Author:  chewbacker [ Wed Feb 08, 2012 12:03 am ]
Post subject:  Re: keeping to my word.

The tiny bit of information that LaSewer has left out, is that Churchill went to the leaders of TFC to ask permmission to seek SBP's help. Permission was given (they didn't want to defend their own teammate). We were led to believe that LC was attacking Churchill as a personal vendetta. Then we found out the truth by various sources including Churchill. That was when we withdrawed from the conflict. Now LaSewer, as i shall call you that from now on since you are being a douchebag by not owning up to the real facts that you know to be the truth to save your own face, smearing SBP's name to is pretty low eh? There's your false information. And you compound it by spreading false information of your own. By the way, i was told this by your "Minister of War".
Russell wrote:
What was the false information?

I note that Trevor said misinformation.

But smearing someones name and producing no reason is a pretty low thing to do.

I assume that pressure was bought onto SP to stop attacking LC an they needed some face-saving reason to withdraw and Churchill was the scapegoat. But I dont KNOW that this was the case.

Anyway LC capped 5 of TFCs gals in retaliation for SP's activity as they have more sence than to attack SP :), nice one Trevor.

If this seems confusing here is the sequence of events:
LC has an undeclared war with TFC
Churchill joined TFC but has some isolated gals
LC attacked and capped the gals
TFC refused to counter attack LC
Churchill called in an SP promise to protect him
SP and Churchill and one other TFC player attacked LC (without any other TFC support or participation)
(note at this point SP would know that Churchill was on TFC)
SP kill several LC bases and withdraw.
The next day they declare the have been "misinformed".
LC then attack TFC and cap 5 more gals in "retaliation"

Author:  Madridista [ Wed Feb 08, 2012 12:32 am ]
Post subject:  Re: keeping to my word.

Everyone should just shoot LC cos Sharky likes furries.

politics are boring! shoot people instead!

Author:  landswimmer [ Wed Feb 08, 2012 2:37 am ]
Post subject:  Re: keeping to my word.

Cygnus wrote:
Do me too! I wanna know my true self!


you have an interest in finding different explanations for things, you're a thinker, and you have an intense need to belong, to be accepted by others

hence why you chose a name that suits the game more than it suits you, and why you try to convey as little information as possible with your names

Mail wrote:
Do me! Do me! Mail/Time Warp.

Timmeh


you're the kind of person who has confidence in anything they do. you overthink things. you have a disconnect in how you see yourself, and how others see you (you think that they think much worse things than they actually think). you always doubt yourself but you never show it, and that self doubt provokes an intense response whenever anyone else tries to doubt you.

if you stopped trying to prove yourself, people would not doubt you. they only doubt you because your subconcious betrays you and causes you to act in ways which indicate you arent sure of yourself (even though deep down you know exactly what you're capable of, and this why you identify so deeply with the doctor who series, the main character is almost godlike yet every episode he must prove himself)

Author:  Mail [ Wed Feb 08, 2012 3:01 am ]
Post subject:  Re: keeping to my word.

landswimmer wrote:
Cygnus wrote:
Do me too! I wanna know my true self!


you have an interest in finding different explanations for things, you're a thinker, and you have an intense need to belong, to be accepted by others

hence why you chose a name that suits the game more than it suits you, and why you try to convey as little information as possible with your names

Mail wrote:
Do me! Do me! Mail/Time Warp.

Timmeh


you're the kind of person who has confidence in anything they do.
you overthink things. you have a disconnect in how you see yourself, and how others see you (you think that they think much worse things than they actually think). you always doubt yourself but you never show it, and that self doubt provokes an intense response whenever anyone else tries to doubt you.

if you stopped trying to prove yourself, people would not doubt you. they only doubt you because your subconcious betrays you and causes you to act in ways which indicate you arent sure of yourself (even though deep down you know exactly what you're capable of, and this why you identify so deeply with the doctor who series, the main character is almost godlike yet every episode he must prove himself)


Green = Agree, Red = Dead wrong.

I also like the Doctor because he ALWAYS does the right thing.

Uncanny.

Timmeh

Author:  Speedbolt [ Wed Feb 08, 2012 4:40 am ]
Post subject:  Re: keeping to my word.

chewbacker wrote:
The tiny bit of information that LaSewer has left out, is that Churchill went to the leaders of TFC to ask permmission to seek SBP's help. Permission was given (they didn't want to defend their own teammate). We were led to believe that LC was attacking Churchill as a personal vendetta. Then we found out the truth by various sources including Churchill. That was when we withdrawed from the conflict. Now LaSewer, as i shall call you that from now on since you are being a douchebag by not owning up to the real facts that you know to be the truth to save your own face, smearing SBP's name to is pretty low eh? There's your false information. And you compound it by spreading false information of your own. By the way, i was told this by your "Minister of War".
Russell wrote:
What was the false information?

I note that Trevor said misinformation.

But smearing someones name and producing no reason is a pretty low thing to do.

I assume that pressure was bought onto SP to stop attacking LC an they needed some face-saving reason to withdraw and Churchill was the scapegoat. But I dont KNOW that this was the case.

Anyway LC capped 5 of TFCs gals in retaliation for SP's activity as they have more sence than to attack SP :), nice one Trevor.

If this seems confusing here is the sequence of events:
LC has an undeclared war with TFC
Churchill joined TFC but has some isolated gals
LC attacked and capped the gals
TFC refused to counter attack LC
Churchill called in an SP promise to protect him
SP and Churchill and one other TFC player attacked LC (without any other TFC support or participation)
(note at this point SP would know that Churchill was on TFC)
SP kill several LC bases and withdraw.
The next day they declare the have been "misinformed".
LC then attack TFC and cap 5 more gals in "retaliation"


May I add that Churchill's gals were the only gals capped/attacked at the time SBP helped. Personal vendetta or not it Churchill was the only victim at that time.

Author:  thijs12b [ Wed Feb 08, 2012 5:30 am ]
Post subject:  Re: keeping to my word.

So what does my name mean?

Author:  playerboy345 [ Wed Feb 08, 2012 5:34 am ]
Post subject:  Re: keeping to my word.

thijs12b wrote:
So what does my name mean?


Image

Author:  thijs12b [ Wed Feb 08, 2012 6:39 am ]
Post subject:  Re: keeping to my word.

All I read was boss.

Author:  Tomzta09 [ Wed Feb 08, 2012 7:07 am ]
Post subject:  Re: keeping to my word.

thijs12b wrote:
All I read was boss.


The truth always hurts.

Author:  landswimmer [ Wed Feb 08, 2012 7:30 am ]
Post subject:  Re: keeping to my word.

thijs12b wrote:
So what does my name mean?


well, 3 people... thijs means it gets its own thread

viewtopic.php?f=4&t=50371&p=616288#p616288

Author:  Tomzta09 [ Wed Feb 08, 2012 8:31 am ]
Post subject:  Re: keeping to my word.

Actually Thijs is pronounced "Ties" in England, so hes basically an accessory.

Author:  Species 8472 [ Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:32 am ]
Post subject:  Re: keeping to my word.

Tomzta09 wrote:
Actually Thijs is pronounced "Ties" in England, so hes basically an accessory.



Could not agree more. That sentence is in essence perfect!

Author:  Cygnus [ Wed Feb 08, 2012 2:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: keeping to my word.

That's actually rather uncanny. o.O

Author:  Speedbolt [ Wed Feb 08, 2012 3:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: keeping to my word.

Can we get back to being sort of on topic and not spamming with "WHAT DOES MY NAME MEAN BRO? NO TELL ME FIRST ME ME ME!!!"

Author:  Russell [ Wed Feb 08, 2012 3:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: keeping to my word.

chewbacker wrote:
The tiny bit of information that LaSewer has left out, is that Churchill went to the leaders of TFC to ask permmission to seek SBP's help. Permission was given (they didn't want to defend their own teammate). We were led to believe that LC was attacking Churchill as a personal vendetta. Then we found out the truth by various sources including Churchill. That was when we withdrawed from the conflict. Now LaSewer, as i shall call you that from now on since you are being a douchebag by not owning up to the real facts that you know to be the truth to save your own face, smearing SBP's name to is pretty low eh? There's your false information. And you compound it by spreading false information of your own. By the way, i was told this by your "Minister of War".
Russell wrote:
What was the false information?

I note that Trevor said misinformation.

But smearing someones name and producing no reason is a pretty low thing to do.

I assume that pressure was bought onto SP to stop attacking LC an they needed some face-saving reason to withdraw and Churchill was the scapegoat. But I dont KNOW that this was the case.

Anyway LC capped 5 of TFCs gals in retaliation for SP's activity as they have more sence than to attack SP :), nice one Trevor.

If this seems confusing here is the sequence of events:
LC has an undeclared war with TFC
Churchill joined TFC but has some isolated gals
LC attacked and capped the gals
TFC refused to counter attack LC
Churchill called in an SP promise to protect him
SP and Churchill and one other TFC player attacked LC (without any other TFC support or participation)
(note at this point SP would know that Churchill was on TFC)
SP kill several LC bases and withdraw.
The next day they declare the have been "misinformed".
LC then attack TFC and cap 5 more gals in "retaliation"


Well I dont resort to name calling, I havent bad mouthed anyone or any team.

Leonard has got a few facts wrong himself, specifically we did go and defend Churchills galaxies but we were unable to prevent their destruction.

Re the "suppressed facts" of TFC knowing that Churchill was going to call on SP to retailiate, that is no secret, it was simply not relevant and for the record it happened when the decision was made not to retaliate.

"We were led to believe that LC was attacking Churchill as a personal vendetta." By whom? Not TFC.

Leonard alleged that we are spreading false information but could not point to any.

As for the "real facts" Leonard did not present anything new just misinformation and name smearing.

I leave you to judge.

Page 4 of 6 All times are UTC - 5 hours
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/